![apple photos download originals apple photos download originals](http://allpicts.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Download-Original-Apple-iPhone-XR-Wallpaper-01-Silver-576x1024.png)
don't treat it as a chache) and then back up normally. It's worse, but not a huge amount worse than having your files be a proprietary blob, say a Word file.Īnd there are of course innumerable services that have data that never leaves the cloud from Facebook at one extreme to various services such as Gantt charts that aren't downloadable in any meaningful way.īut as I said I don't think this one case is a good example: In the case of Apple's stuff, I can keep it all current on my laptop: just tell photos, iCloud files, music etc to keep a complete copy on the local disk (i.e. Google Docs itself is proprietary (if you map the Google Drive files to your local filesystem in the style of Dropbox the actual local data store locally is just a URI). There is a real risk but it's not that different from the pre cloud era: that of proprietary formats. An increasing number of people don't have laptops but instead just phones and game consoles, so so have no access to normal data-centric affordances.
#Apple photos download originals registration
For your regulation idea to be meaningful, GDPR and similar privacy regulation around the world would have to be overhauled - if all the "open API" can do is import/export my personal data sans social graph, it becomes little more than a backup mechanism and a convenient way to fill out registration forms.Īlthough I do consider "digital feudalism" a legitimate risk, I don't think this is a good example. GDPR as written does help protect privacy, but it's also an incredible boon to social network incumbents: it under it, your social graph can't be treated as your data, because by definition it contains personally identifiable information about all your contacts. "But doesn't that violate GDPR?" someone is raising their hand to say, and: yes.
![apple photos download originals apple photos download originals](https://img.wallpapersafari.com/tablet/768/1024/76/52/zQfO61.jpg)
(And, of course, that's why Twitter shut down that API after that.) That's arguably how Instagram bootstrapped its success initially: if you gave it your Twitter account, it would download all your followers/following info. What I actually need is a way to import the user's social graph from Facebook or Twitter. What it seems to me you want is a couple steps beyond data portability, which honestly really isn't enough on its own. Standardized APIs aimed at enabling full-featured third-party social network clients wouldn't really contribute to a robust market in competing social networks they'd just contribute to a robust market in, well, third-party social network clients. At least in the case that the OP was taking about - third-party Facebook clients - I don't think it would "destroy their walled garden" any more than third-party Twitter clients did back when those were meaningfully a thing. it would subject their applications to genuine competition (they could of course still offer their own client) and destroy their walled garden, which is the entire point.